Packaging and Solid Waste Generation.

Donald E. Lewis

ResearchPublished 1972

Investigates the possible contribution by the packaging industry to the solid waste management problem. Two questions were examined: (1) What effect does packaging have on solid waste generation? (2) How can the packaging industry's increasing effect on the problem be handled? Tables are presented that identify solid waste composition, show changes in its composition between 1952 and 1967, and also show the percentage changes for all categories of waste over that period. The percentage of waste materials associated with the packaging industry has risen. Several moves by federal and state agencies and the packaging industry itself are afoot to alleviate the growing waste contribution from the packaging revolution. More data are needed to determine the precise extent of this contribution to waste generation; and then it must be decided whether the packaging design should be controlled, or if the real solution to waste elimination lies in development of a satisfactory disposal system. 12 pp. Ref.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
12 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1972
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 12
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-4820

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Lewis, Donald E., Packaging and Solid Waste Generation. RAND Corporation, P-4820, 1972. As of September 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4820.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Lewis, Donald E., Packaging and Solid Waste Generation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1972. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4820.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.