Paper presented to the Legislative Action Committee, U.S. Conference of Mayors, on urban policy analyses dealing with unplanned, uncontrolled urban growth. San Jose is used as an example and the specific influences that contributed to San Jose's problems are identified. One is the post-World-War-II move to the suburbs by many Americans who were supported by federal FHA and VA mortgage policies. The explicit policy for some years was segregation. The federal housing policy facilitated the departure of the middle class from the city and helped produce the consequent inner-city problems and immense city sprawl. Current policy, especially income-tax policy, also contributes to the problem in a similar way by allowing deductions for home ownership and reinforcing flight to the suburbs. These examples point out the very limited control that local decisionmakers have over their cities. Consequently, much more attention must be paid to those federal policies that may reshape our cities.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.