An empirical study of the degree of restrictiveness of the so-called "exclusivity provisions" of the new cable television regulations of the Federal Communications Commission. These provisions require that certain programs be blacked out on the cable when broadcast by distant stations. To determine what difference these exclusivity provisions make and how much programming is affected, the program schedules of independent stations that might be carried as distant signals are compared with lists of programs that would have to be blacked out under the new rules. Information from four stations was used, and the general conclusion is that the exclusivity provisions severely restrict distant signals in markets where distant signals are not very important anyway--those with good over-the-air independent service. In markets where distant signals are important--those with little or no over-the-air independent service--the exclusivity provisions leave distant signals more-or-less intact. 8 pp.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.