Soviet Naval Interaction with the United States and Its Influence on Soviet Naval Development
ResearchPublished 1972
ResearchPublished 1972
This paper draws from a larger, continuing study on the role of the interaction phenomenon in the area of strategy, foreign policy, and military posture. Soviet naval development is examined in the context of three distinct periods. (1) 1945 to mid-1950 saw a gradual jelling of Soviet-American rivalry into the mutual animosity of the Cold War, with America having a temporary nuclear monopoly. (2) 1950 to 1962 became an era marked by critical transition to intense bipolar competition and the formation of opposing military alliances in Europe. (3) 1962 to 1972 — from the Cuban confrontation to the signing of the SALT I accords, which formally validated the Soviet Union's attainment of strategic "equality" with the United States — marked a new phase in which the two superpowers' rivalry was being conditioned by a more complex pattern of world politics than had prevailed earlier.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.