Cover: Evaluating Administrative Court Reforms.

Evaluating Administrative Court Reforms.

Published 1973

by John B. Jennings

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback26 pages $20.00

A set of broad administrative objectives is tentatively suggested for a criminal court. Some of these are aimed at improving the quality of justice, some at reducing the burden imposed by administrative procedures on individuals and agencies, and some at increasing efficiency. The success of any administrative reform should be evaluated in terms of a precise set of objectives such as these. While, in many instances, the evaluation must be subjective in nature, a set of objective criteria, or measures of performance, should be used wherever possible. Appendix I is a glossary of court-related terms used. Appendix II derives three formulas for estimating case flow through the courts, developed for and used by the Criminal Court of the City of New York. 26 pp.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.