Evaluating Administrative Court Reforms.

by John B. Jennings

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback26 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

A set of broad administrative objectives is tentatively suggested for a criminal court. Some of these are aimed at improving the quality of justice, some at reducing the burden imposed by administrative procedures on individuals and agencies, and some at increasing efficiency. The success of any administrative reform should be evaluated in terms of a precise set of objectives such as these. While, in many instances, the evaluation must be subjective in nature, a set of objective criteria, or measures of performance, should be used wherever possible. Appendix I is a glossary of court-related terms used. Appendix II derives three formulas for estimating case flow through the courts, developed for and used by the Criminal Court of the City of New York. 26 pp.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.