Cover: Empirical Bayes Methods Applied to Spatial Analysis Problems.

Empirical Bayes Methods Applied to Spatial Analysis Problems.

Published 1973

by Grace M. Carter, John E. Rolph

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback25 pages $20.00

A generalization of empirical Bayes estimators to the case in which the components have unequal variance. This estimator is applied to the spatial analysis problem of estimating the probability that a fire alarm reported from a particular street box signals a structural fire rather than a false alarm, rubbish fire or other emergency. The approach is to group alarm boxes into relatively homogeneous neighborhoods and to make empirical Bayes estimates of the "probability structural" for each box in the neighborhood for yearly (1967-1969) Bronx data. The results are evaluated by measuring how a dispatching rule based on the estimates performs on 1970 data. (Basic research on an OEO grant; for publication in the [Journal of the American Statistical Association].) 25 pp. Ref.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.