Comments on a paper by Peter Brown, "Informed Consent in Social Experimentation," given at a Conference on Moral, Ethical, and Legal Issues of Social Experimentation. In Brown's analysis of the role of informed consent in social experiments, he has argued first that a certain type of person exists for whom the consent doctrine is inappropriate; these people are either not sufficiently perceptive or too poor to make wise decisions. Brown's second point is that nonparticipants in the experiment who are affected by it ought to have the right to disapprove of it, and ,if the experiment proceeds, ought to be compensated. The author disputes these arguments. 11 pp. Bibliog.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.