An Aggregate Urban Transportation Model: Econometric Specification.
ResearchPublished 1973
ResearchPublished 1973
While much previous transportation research has been devoted to estimating the user and socioeconomic impacts of routes, emerging problems seem to relate more to total volume of travel: improving air quality relates closely to total automobile and truck travel volumes; gasoline consumption is a function of total automobile and truck travel volumes; and travel volumes along particular routes are of little importance to energy problems. This paper derives a model of aggregate transportation relationships within an urban region. The model consists of two estimated equations and two equilibrium relations that can be used to determine vehicle miles, public transit trips, average public transit price, and public transit vehicle miles, if the marginal cost of public transit trips and vehicle miles is known. Cost information can be obtained by estimating a cost function for public transit firms. 29 pp. Bibliog.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.