Cover: Cost and Efficiency in Military Specialty Training

Cost and Efficiency in Military Specialty Training

Published 1974

by Robert M. Gay, Gary R. Nelson


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback31 pages $20.00

Analyzes military specialty training as an investment. In FY 1973, the Department of Defense spent over $6 billion on formal training alone. Costs of on-the-job training (OJT) have previously been largely unquantified. A methodology for quantifying these costs by comparing trainees' pay and productivity over time is described. In a pilot study of 64 trainees, the estimated average cost of OJT was about $6,600. Trainees had attended a 12-week technical school course costing about $3,200. Both previous education and measured mental ability were strongly related to estimated training costs. An additional year of education was associated with about 10 percent reduction in OJT costs. Ten more points of measured mental ability was associated with about 6 percent reduction. A statistically weaker result was that nonwhites were approximately 11 percent less costly to train in the specialty studied than whites. Possible reasons for this result are discussed. Current Rand work relating to selection of efficient training policies is discussed. (Presented at Eighth Annual DOD Cost Research Symposium, November 1973.)

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.