The Price Elasticity of Residential Energy Use

by Kent P. Anderson


Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback21 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

The long-run elasticity of household energy consumption with respect to price can be expressed as the sum of a usage-level and a fuel-choice elasticity. Using 50-state data for 1960 and 1970, this study describes procedures for estimating mean values for both total elasticity and its two components. The procedures involve the estimation of equations for predicting stocks of energy-using equipment by energy type as well as equations for predicting energy consumption. For "own-prices," the resulting estimates suggest a mean usage-level elasticity of about one-third for electricity and (less certainly) utility gas and a mean fuel-choice elasticity of about 0.8 for electricity and 1.7 for gas. Mean cross-price elasticities vary depending on the energy type and price considered.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.