Serving the Deaf-Blind Population
Planning for 1980
ResearchPublished 1974
Planning for 1980
ResearchPublished 1974
The rubella epidemic of the mid-1960s has contributed to a much larger than average cohort of deaf-blind children. As they progress upward in age, some very major problems will occur in responding to their needs. Today's fragmented service system suffers from underdeveloped prevention services; lack of information on effective planning; and failure to mobilize far enough in advance to meet known future needs of the deaf-blind handicapped population. In this paper, the authors discuss (1) the planning required to meet the needs of young deaf-blind persons in 1980; (2) the need for information about and control of the service system; (3) the need to improve identification programs, especially for older deaf-blind persons; (4) the humanitarian and economic desirability of prevention; and (5) the probable size of the young deaf-blind population in 1980 and the cost of serving it. (See also R-1220, R-1420.)
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.