The Simulation of Arctic Climate with a Global General Circulation Model.
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback40 pages||$23.00||$18.40 20% Web Discount|
A two-level global circulation model is used to simulate the Arctic climate for both January and July. From separate month-long simulations, the summer and winter distributions of pressure, surface air temperature, precipitation, and cloudiness north of 50 N are compared with the corresponding observed fields. While the model's results bear an overall resemblance to observation, a number of errors are noted: the model's January surface air temperatures are too high, the summer rainfall is too low over the North Atlantic and North Pacific oceans, and the cloudiness is much too low over the entire region. These are attributed primarily to the model's inadequate treatment of the surface boundary layer and low-level marine convection. The need for further climatological observations in the Arctic is also recognized. 40 pp. Ref.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.