Focusing on some implications of PGMs for force posture and the conduct of warfare, the author discusses the properties of these munitions and asks: How will they affect the relative usefulness of the advanced tank? the complex fighter-bomber? the big aircraft carrier? What will be the consequences for organization of land forces and for their tactics, particularly with reference to NATO? What are the political consequences? Three main conclusions emerge: (1) Since current PGMs are designed for specific defensive tasks and are not well-suited for an offense, hopefully their acquisition by both the U.S. and the SU will lead to greater stability. (2) The pace of war will be faster. (3) Precision delivery means that military targets can be destroyed with less total explosive power and less collateral damage to nonmilitary targets. 19 pp. (DGS)
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.