Focused Flow Diagrams: An Aid to System Analysis.

S. Glaseman, Dennis Hollingworth

ResearchPublished 1974

This paper describes the methodological results of a research project involving the security characteristics of a large-scale computer operating system. The research involved an in-depth analysis of a complex subsystem, and the preparation of diagrammatic, as well as textual, results. To achieve diagrammatic representation, the authors developed and implemented the Focused Flow Diagram (FFD), defined as a terse, unambiguous scheme for easily representing selected aspects of processing in a generally familiar format. Some observations of the FFD methodology are: (1) FFDs work better than flowcharts in an analytical situation because they have fewer symbols to remember and explicitly provide for the inclusion of textual amplification to the diagram. (2) The FFD representation is easy to read and has a relatively high data rate, easing final documentation of results. (3) Similarity to flowcharts means only a small investment in new learning. 15 pp.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
15 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1974
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 15
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-5316

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Glaseman, S. and Dennis Hollingworth, Focused Flow Diagrams: An Aid to System Analysis. RAND Corporation, P-5316, 1974. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5316.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Glaseman, S. and Dennis Hollingworth, Focused Flow Diagrams: An Aid to System Analysis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1974. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5316.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.