Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback6 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

An article prepared for the [Los Angeles Times] Opinion section. Although a map of the Indian Ocean may give the impression of a self-contained geographic entity, this leads to oversimplification of the complex political relations that exist. Further, a viewpoint focused on the ocean itself is misleading in that it overemphasizes a naval strategic point of view to the exclusion of important political considerations. The Indian Ocean area in fact contains at least five important sub-areas whose diverse cultures, varying strategic positions, and different economic levels preclude any cohesive political or cultural integration. After discussing Soviet and U.S. maritime and political activity in the area, as well as Chinese Communist political interests, the author concludes that no single policy will suffice in either the strategic or the diplomatic aspects of international competition in the Indian Ocean area. To avoid a costly and counter-productive competitive naval buildup in the Indian Ocean, it is suggested that the United States actively seek a naval arms limitation agreement, with appropriate safeguards. 6 pp.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.