Improving Educational Evaluation in a Political Setting.
Expert InsightsPublished 1974
Discusses a series of theoretical and practical problems of assessing effects of school policies using imperfect achievement data and limited controls for the nonschool factors that influence scores. In the context of a case study, it is seen how seemingly "technical" issues of collecting, analyzing, and presenting achievement score data interrelate with the overriding political and organizational problems of a statewide evaluation. There is also a problem of making collected information useful to policymakers while avoiding misuse and misinterpretation of the data. The paper suggests several ways to analyze limited information that both improve the decisionmaking relevance of evaluation and decrease the adverse political consequences. 33 pp. Ref.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1974
- Pages: 33
- Document Number: P-5327
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.