Argues for consideration of substantially lower prompt radiation dosage requirements in U.S./NATO tactical nuclear weapon selection, based on hitherto neglected operational and political considerations and an examination of published Soviet military doctrine. The greatest risk in not selecting lower dosages is not that military effectiveness may be too low, but that permission for use may be denied by political authority--and the larger the weapon yield the greater the risk of denial. Moreover, dosage requirements are set unrealistically high in the sense that delayed casualties and damage to equipment are not taken into account. Enhanced radiation warheads, which can be substituted for fission warheads ten times larger with the same radiobiological effectiveness, offer significant prospects for reduced collateral damage. (Based on a presentation to the Tactical Nuclear Warfare Working Group at the 34th meeting of the Military Operations Research Society at Ft. Eustace, Va.) 22 pp. Ref.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.