Economic Performance, Wage Patterns and the Chinese Revolution
A Review of Three Books on the Economy of the People's Republic of China
Expert InsightsPublished 1975
A Review of Three Books on the Economy of the People's Republic of China
Expert InsightsPublished 1975
Reviews three books on Chinese economic development that differ markedly in methodology, substance, and style: (1) a compendium of ten papers submitted to the Joint Economic Committee of Congress, (2) Christopher Howe, Wage Patterns and Wage Policy in Modern China, 1910-1972, and (3) Eric Axilrod, The Political Economy of the Chinese Revolution. Of the JEC compendium, the reviewer feels that each paper is a major contribution, and together they form by far the best study of the current state of the Chinese economy. He would recommend it to all serious scholars and intelligent laymen, Howe's book to the professionals, and Axilrod's only to those well enough informed to avoid the pitfalls of its shortcomings. (Prepared at the request of USIS journal, Problems of Communism.)
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.