Innovations in Classroom Organization.

Milbrey Wallin McLaughlin

ResearchPublished 1975

A discussion of the challenges and problems encountered in classroom organization changes that seek to redefine assumptions about children and learning that underlie traditional methods. Observations of five Title III projects at five school districts showed that organization changes are exceedingly complex: they require new attitudes, roles, and behavior on the part of teachers and administrators and involve such innovations as open education, multiage grouping, the integrated day, differentiated staffing, and team teaching. But their very lack of specificity may contribute to success. Success depends largely on (1) the motivations of key personnel during project initiation; and (2) the selection of implementation strategies that foster mutual adaptation and "learning-by-doing." Says the author: "Successful implementation ... is neither an automatic nor a certain process ... strategies ... work together, in concert, to promote adaptation and change." 15 pp. Ref.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
15 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1975
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 15
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-5439

Citation

RAND Style Manual
McLaughlin, Milbrey Wallin, Innovations in Classroom Organization. RAND Corporation, P-5439, 1975. As of September 5, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5439.html
Chicago Manual of Style
McLaughlin, Milbrey Wallin, Innovations in Classroom Organization. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1975. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5439.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.