An Overview of the Air Force Intrasystem Analysis Program (IAP).
Expert InsightsPublished 1975
Describes the Air Force Intrasystem Analysis Program (IAP) that is based on R-1114/1 and R-1690/1, to ensure electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)--ability of systems to function without undue degradation caused by electromagnetic interference. The IAP will include computer analysis capability for (1) vulnerability assessment, (2) design of specification limits, (3) compatibility and waiver analysis for design tradeoffs, and (4) predicting EMC control effectiveness before construction. The Intrasystem Electromagnetic Compatibility Analysis Program (IEMCAP) includes models of EM generators, receptors, and couplings. The IAP also includes (1) supplemental models for aircraft stores, electroexplosive devices and subsystems, lightning, magnetospheric substorms, and static electricity; (2) nonlinear and EM/near field analysis models for off-line use; (3) instrumentation, test, and measurement support equipment; (4) training courses; (5) validation/implementation; and (6) the Air Force database management. The Office of Primary Responsibility is Headquarters, AFSC (SDDE), and RADC/RBC is the lead laboratory. The contractors, Air Force project offices, and completion status of each IAP component are listed. Research on EM implications of new structural materials is proposed. (Prepared, at the request of Rome Air Development Center/RBC, for presentation at the 1975 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, San Antonio, October 1975.) 3 pp. Ref.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1975
- Pages: 3
- Document Number: P-5474
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.