Differences in Satisfaction with Health Care Services as a Function of Recipient
Self or Others
ResearchPublished 1975
Summarizes two studies designed to determine whether or not conclusions about consumer satisfaction are different when questionnaires are designed to measure attitudes toward characteristics of one's own health care services as opposed to attitudes toward care received by people in general. Pairs of questionnaire items measuring attitude toward ten health services characteristics were constructed so as to vary only with regard to item referent, i.e., care received by the respondent versus care received by people in general. Consistent differences (more favorable ratings for items having individual referent) were observed across concepts (services characteristics) and samples as a function of difference in item referent. No differences in factor content, stability, or validity were observed as a function of difference in item referent. A number of plausible explanations for these results are discussed and some implications for the design and interpretation of health care surveys are noted.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 1975
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 20
- Paperback Price: $20.00
- Document Number: P-5488
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Snyder, Mary K. and John E. Ware, Differences in Satisfaction with Health Care Services as a Function of Recipient: Self or Others, RAND Corporation, P-5488, 1975. As of September 5, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5488.html
Snyder, Mary K. and John E. Ware, Differences in Satisfaction with Health Care Services as a Function of Recipient: Self or Others. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1975. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5488.html. Also available in print form.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.