Balance in Coastal and Inland Industrial Development in the People's Republic of China.

by Charles Robert Roll, Jr., K. C. Yeh

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback29 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Examines the question of why China's coastal and inland areas have had equal aggregate output growth despite heavier investment in the interior. In 1952, seven comparatively advanced coastal provinces, with 40 percent of total population and 11 percent of total area, had 33 percent of the farmland and 68 percent of national output. Communist planners have been seeking to develop the interior in order to reduce vulnerability to enemy attack, cut transportation costs by putting production facilities near raw materials, and develop local self-sufficiency. This paper traces the history of changes in implementation in response to current conditions, since greater production at lower cost could be achieved quickly by smaller investment in the developed areas. The disruptions of the Cultural Revolution, the failure of the Great Leap Forward, and the removal of Soviet technicians affected the underdeveloped interior more severely and required greater coastal production to meet immediate needs. If China had not favored the inland areas, she would almost certainly have a dual economy now. 29 pp. Ref. (Prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of Congress.)

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.