The Relationship Between Medical Malpractice and Quality of Care
ResearchPublished 1975
Examines the impact of present and future malpractice systems on the quality of medical care. The paper is divided into four parts: (1) consideration of quality-of-care constructs; (2) an overview of those issues of medical malpractice which are pertinent to quality-of-care considerations; (3) examination of the relationship, both theoretical and empirical, between malpractice and quality-of-care; and (4) development of policy and research suggestions for understanding and altering the current malpractice system. The idea was advanced that sanctions on providers for malpractice should be separate from mechanisms for reimbursement of patients for injuries from that malpractice. The current Professional Standards Review Organization program should be strengthened by including both the public and health providers other than physicians, by covering both ambulatory and hospital care, and by extending its authority to sanction providers.
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 1975
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 39
- Paperback Price: $20.00
- Document Number: P-5526
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Brook, Robert H., R. L. Brutoco, and Kathleen N. Williams, The Relationship Between Medical Malpractice and Quality of Care, RAND Corporation, P-5526, 1975. As of September 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5526.html
Brook, Robert H., R. L. Brutoco, and Kathleen N. Williams, The Relationship Between Medical Malpractice and Quality of Care. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1975. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5526.html. Also available in print form.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.