At the Foot of the Evidence

Some Thoughts on Rationality, Values, Scientific Knowledge and the Social Sciences

Wendy Allen

Expert InsightsPublished 1975

Discusses the twin philosophical problems of knowing and valuing in an effort to answer two questions: (1) How do personal belief systems, models, and expectations influence our perception and description of events and processes? (2) What is the relationship between knowing and valuing, and what should we do about it? Social scientists have had difficulty coming to grips with what Ernest Becker called "the tragic paradox of social science": How is the ethical, evaluative person to be made congruent with the careful, scientifically responsible researcher? The views of three philosophers and social scientists who have contributed important insights--Ernest Becker, Gunnar Myrdal, and Marjorie Grene--are taken up. T. C. Chamberlin's practical "method of multiple working hypotheses," developed in the late nineteenth century for use in geological investigation, is shown to be applicable to social science; an example from the recent history of population ecology demonstrates its utility for biologists as well. 26 pp. Ref.

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Allen, Wendy, At the Foot of the Evidence: Some Thoughts on Rationality, Values, Scientific Knowledge and the Social Sciences. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1975. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5543.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.