Classification of Personal Information for Privacy Protection Purposes.
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback21 pages||$20.00||$16.00 20% Web Discount|
Laws now in effect in several countries require protection of individual privacy in personal information recordkeeping systems maintained by the central, state and local governments and, in some countries, by private business and industry. It is desirable for the implementation of privacy protection requirements to establish a standard sensitivity scale and a classification system for personal information. With an emphasis on the privacy protection requirements in the United States, this paper surveys several classification systems that have been discussed in the literature, examines the criteria for setting up such systems, proposes a new sensitivity scale and corresponding classification system, and discusses the information integrity and security provisions that should be adequate for each classification level. 21 pp. Ref.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.