Strategies of Conflict in China During 1975-1976.

by Kenneth G. Lieberthal

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback16 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Divisions in Peking politics allow characterization of leaders as radicals, moderates, or military. The radicals have their strengths in propaganda, the moderates in executive policymaking positions of the bureaucracy. The period spring 1975 through spring 1976 is analyzed in three segments. (1) Spring 1975 until Chou En-lai's death in January 1975: The moderates tried to put their people into important posts, and to firmly establish their programs before Chou En-lai died. The radicals raised issues over which they would seek to topple Teng Hsiao-p'ing. (2) Chou's funeral until Ch'ing Ming Festival, April 4, 1976: Radicals began a political whirlwind to remove enemies and programs; moderates used their resources to keep political campaign under control. (3) April 5 to May 1976: After a full-scale riot on April 5 put down by police and military, the Central Committee dismissed Teng Hsiao-p'ing as vice-premier and Party vice-chairman and appointed Hua Kuo-feng as premier and first vice-chairman of the Party. The little that is known about Hua's political views suggests he leans toward the moderate camp. 16 pp.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.