The Design and Evaluation of a Prototype Data Management and Analysis System for Clinical Investigators
ResearchPublished 1976
ResearchPublished 1976
The CLINFO project has defined the most critical information processing needs of clinical investigators as managing and analyzing the research data collected by individual investigators. It has developed a prototype minicomputer-based system to meet these needs and is operating two prototype systems in General Clinical Research Centers where they are being evaluated. The present phase of the project is the iterative design and development of the prototypes, and the collection of detailed information on use at more than one site. If the estimated costs and benefits are reasonable and user acceptance is high, the next phase of the project will be specifying a system for many researchers, and planning commercial development and distribution. This paper discusses the project's techniques for requirements analysis, design, and evaluation, and describes early experiences with users.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.