Implementation of Professional Standards Review Organizations: A Theoretical Discussion.

Kathleen N. Williams

ResearchPublished 1976

Using concepts of implementation analysis, this paper examines potential outcomes of the PSRO program, the federal government's effort to assure high quality and efficiency in health services. Support for PSROs at the local level, among professionals and the public, is uneven, suggesting implementation problems for recently or yet-to-be established PSROs. Mutual adaptation of program and local institution depends on the degree to which local needs are given emphasis. Continued willingness by the federal government to accommodate local problems and objectives is required. Evaluation procedures for PSROs should be developed now as an integral part of the on-going program. Whether the PSRO program can overcome mobilization and operationalization problems remains to be seen. Problems as outlined will influence program implementation at all stages and early cognizance should be taken of them. The rush to establish the PSRO system may have deprived implementation issues of the attention they warrant. 21 pp. Ref.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
21 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1976
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 21
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-5757

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Williams, Kathleen N., Implementation of Professional Standards Review Organizations: A Theoretical Discussion. RAND Corporation, P-5757, 1976. As of September 5, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5757.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Williams, Kathleen N., Implementation of Professional Standards Review Organizations: A Theoretical Discussion. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1976. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5757.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.