Cover: The Impact of the New Mexico Experimental Medical Care Review Organization on the Quality of the Use of Injections.

The Impact of the New Mexico Experimental Medical Care Review Organization on the Quality of the Use of Injections.

Published 1976

by Robert H. Brook, Kathleen N. Williams

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback28 pages $20.00

Evaluation of the impact of formal peer review of the New Mexico Medicaid program during its first two years of operation demonstrated that peer review can affect the level of quality of care provided. Use of injections dropped by over 60 percent. Major decreases occurred in the use of antibiotics (e.g., lincomycin, tetracycline, and short-acting penicillin), certain steroids, and antispasmodics. Analysis of the relationship between physician characteristics and the proper use of injections demonstrated the following: (1) being a member of a group practice that billed under its own name was the variable most significantly associated with the proper use of injections; (2) for physicians billing under their own names, being board-certified was the principal predictor of higher quality care; (3) provider type (being an M.D. rather than a D.O.) and specialty were also significant predictors of quality; (4) foreign medical graduates did not give substantially worse care than did U.S. graduates; and (5) the 6 percent of physicians who gave 40 percent of the medically unnecessary injections changed their behavior dramatically for the better. 28 pp. Ref.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.