Causes of the medical malpractice insurance crisis: risks and regulations
ResearchPublished 1976
ResearchPublished 1976
Analyzes the causes of the recent dramatic increase in malpractice insurance rates and contraction of the market in risk spreading, exemplified by the withdrawal of commercial carriers from some states, the growth of physician-owned mutuals, and the switch from an occurrence to a claims made policy form. Some of these institutional changes appear consistent with an efficient market response to the changed nature of the risk involved in writing malpractice insurance--in particular, increased frequency and severity of claims, instability of the sociolegal environment, depletion of insurers' net worth, and lower mean and higher variance of return on reserves. Total withdrawal of commercial carriers can only be explained by regulatory control of rates and reserve requirements, exacerbated by medical society resistance to selective underwriting, deductibles, and experience rating. 38 pp. Bibliog.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.