Federal and State Regulations Concerning the Privacy of Health Care Data
ResearchPublished 1977
ResearchPublished 1977
State regulations or laws are frequently silent on rights of access or legal status of records, and questions of ownership of records are almost never examined. There is much health care information available for public inspection with essentially no access control. At the federal level, health records are exempt from the Freedom of Information Act. In the case of the National Center for Health Statistics, the law prescribes permissible uses of the data collected, prohibits other use, specifies how it shall be published and establishes immunity from judicial seizure. The Privacy Act of 1974 has only been in operation a year. It formed the Privacy Protection Study Commission to look into privacy problems of the recordkeeping practices of nonfederal public and private institutions. It is clear that hospitals will have to establish better controls over access to records than they have at present.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.