Cover: The role of partial and best matches in knowledge systems

The role of partial and best matches in knowledge systems

Published 1977

by Frederick Hayes-Roth

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback36 pages $20.00

Partial matching is a comparison of two or more descriptions that identifies their similarities. Determining which of several descriptions is most similar to one description of interest is called the best match problem. Partial and best matches underlie several knowledge system functions, including analogical reasoning, inductive inference, predicate discovery, pattern-directed inference, semantic interpretation, and speech and image understanding. Because partial matching is both combinatorial and ill-structured, admissible algorithms are elusive. Economical solutions require very effective use of constraints that, apparently, can be provided only by globally organized knowledge bases. Examples of such organizations are provided, and promising avenues of research are proposed.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.