Energy choices and preference relation "paradoxes"

by Bruno Augenstein

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback8 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Using examples from a set of hypothesized energy choices, the author illustrates some of the simplest results of the standard theory of social preference relations that show how quickly one reaches apparent inconsistencies and counterintuitive consequences when one attempts to formalize intuitive notions of preferences. Limitations of R&D in moderating such results are noted.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.