Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback13 pages $20.00

Outlines the dramatic changes in medical recordkeeping and describes measures proposed to counter threats to the privacy of patients. Medical records used to be a private matter between patient and physician. Now they are being widely used for employment, insurance, litigation, and government records. Because of traditional practices in medical care, the records tend to be shared freely, eroding their confidentiality and depriving the patient of control over who sees them and how they are used. Many hospitals, for example, inadequately protect records, and do not have controls for access to them. The Privacy Protection Study Commission, created by a 1974 Congressional act, has proposed measures to remedy these deficiencies and to guarantee the patient's right to see and correct his records and to be informed if they are released without his authorization.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.