Witnesses' Perception of Meaning
ResearchPublished 1977
Subjects presented with a videotape of a fight and disruption perceived the event in terms of meaningful generalizations. The conclusions that subjects formed remained stable over 28 days. In contrast, detailed memory rapidly deteriorated for subjects who were not required to rehearse their memory of the event. As a result, subjects increasingly reported recognizing details that supported and apparently were inferred from their general conclusions. The study showed that subjects' conclusions about meaning affect their selective attention to detail, and subjects who expected violence and disruption formed more certain general conclusions. Finally, the study indicated that repeated rehearsal may promote and even enhance accurate memory for meaningful information. Among rehearsing subjects accuracy of recognition for meaningful information showed a significant quadratic trend--increasing through seven days before returning to the original level after 28 days. Over the same period accuracy for irrelevant information showed the usual negatively accelerated trend.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 1977
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 19
- Paperback Price: $20.00
- Document Number: P-5975
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Peterson, Mark A., Witnesses' Perception of Meaning, RAND Corporation, P-5975, 1977. As of October 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5975.html
Peterson, Mark A., Witnesses' Perception of Meaning. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1977. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5975.html. Also available in print form.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.