Accuracy of information records is of paramount importance for the fair treatment of an individual in contemporary society. An accurate record may not assure fairness, but an inaccurate record will frequently lead to unfairness. It is in the interests of electronic data processing (EDP) specialists, of corporate organizations, and of all individuals that such records be accurate because accuracy of record is a basic requirement for fairness of treatment. This paper highlights the findings of the Privacy Protection Commission, and points out the obligations of data processing professionals in regard to assuring the individuals's right to privacy: (1) Make sure privacy is recognized as a corporate matter. (2) EDP managers can participate in the decisionmaking process, make suggestions, and estimate costs. (3) They will be involved in protecting information, controlling its use, and assuring its accuracy. (4) EDP personnel will have to share the liability for things that go wrong in record systems.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.