Specifying and estimating multi-product cost functions for a regulated telephone company

Bridger M. Mitchell

Expert InsightsPublished 1978

Discussant's comments on a paper by M. Fuss and L. Waverman presented at the National Bureau of Economic Research Conference on Public Regulation in Arlington, Virginia, December 1977. This paper summarizes the model used by Fuss and Waverman, critically examines their use of time-series data, modeling of regulatory constraints and specification of demand relationships and then proposes an alternative approach to estimating long-run cost and production functions that relies on pseudo-data generated from a process model.

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1978
  • Pages: 9
  • Document Number: P-6078

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Mitchell, Bridger M., Specifying and estimating multi-product cost functions for a regulated telephone company. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1978. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6078.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.