Federal decisions on health policy should be informed by sound health services research. Inadequate funding is only part of the problem; improving the quality by improving the process for awarding grants and contracts is also necessary. The grants awards process of the National Center for Health Services Research differs in significant ways from the NIH process; the director can override decisions of study sections, and selection of study section members is less related to their research contributions. The awards process for other health services research is more difficult to evaluate because it is less open to scrutiny. Large scale demonstrations have design weaknesses which severely limit conclusions that can be drawn. Researchers tend to be too narrow in their approach to the health care system, while policymakers demand solutions with an unrealistic urgency. Few important changes occur so quickly that they cannot be affected by 12-25 months of analysis.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.