Cover: The Nelson-Noll policy preference mirror and other approaches to policy decisionmaking applied to the New York/Huntsville assignment problem

The Nelson-Noll policy preference mirror and other approaches to policy decisionmaking applied to the New York/Huntsville assignment problem

Published 1978

by Rolla Edward Park

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback9 pages $20.00

Discussion of Forrest Nelson and Roger Noll, "In Search of Scientific Regulation: The UHF Allocation Experiment," presented at the Sixth Annual Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Airlie, Virginia, May 1978. The Nelson-Noll paper describes an innovative way to measure policymakers' preference for assignment of television channels to various cities. The discussion compares the Nelson-Noll results to more traditional methods of policy decisionmaking. For example, the Nelson-Noll approach leads to a more equal distribution of channels, and lower aggregate benefits to viewers, than does traditional cost-benefit analysis.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.