Cover: Evolution of the U.S. organizational setup for dealing with SALT

Evolution of the U.S. organizational setup for dealing with SALT

by Rose E. Gottemoeller

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback39 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

A study of the national security bureaucracies that have formulated policy and handled preparations for the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) through four succeeding presidential administrations. The paper describes the Johnson, Nixon, and Ford bureaucracies, but because of topical interest, focuses on changes in the policymaking apparatus since President Carter took office in January 1977. The paper also addresses the question of the most efficient mix of agencies, personnel, and resources for the formulation of SALT policy and suggests that because the policy problems associated with SALT are so varied in nature, solutions should be sought at different levels, using both ad hoc and formal methods.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.