Testimony before the Ontario Energy Board: prepared evidence

Jan Paul Acton

ResearchPublished 1979

Evidence submitted in January 1979 to the Ontario Energy Board, prepared for the Public Interest Advocacy Center on behalf of the National Antipoverty Organization of Canada. The author argues: Marginal cost pricing of electricity is feasible and a sound basis for ratemaking, and promotes economic efficiency, fairness, and financial adequacy. There is abundant evidence that electricity customers can adjust satisfactorily to time-of-day electricity rates, and that these adjustments are beneficial to both the utility and to customers in achieving lowered electricity bills. Time-of-day rates give customers opportunities for cost saving that conventional rates do not. In many cases it increases the competitive advantage of industrial customers to have time-of-day rates available. The line management proposal to create a "diversity benefit" subsidy and to apply it selectively to certain large customers constitutes discrimination in rate making not based on differences in costs of supply.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
72 pages
List Price
$25.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1979
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 72
  • Paperback Price: $25.00
  • Document Number: P-6289

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Acton, Jan Paul, Testimony before the Ontario Energy Board: prepared evidence, RAND Corporation, P-6289, 1979. As of September 24, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6289.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Acton, Jan Paul, Testimony before the Ontario Energy Board: prepared evidence. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1979. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6289.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.