An evaluation of alternative functional models of narrative schemata

by Frank R. Yekovich, Perry W. Thorndyke

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback44 pages $23.00 $18.40 20% Web Discount

Comparatively evaluates models of how people encode and retrieve information from short narrative texts. Twenty models were derived from assumptions about (1) whether propositions are differentially encoded according to narrative importance, (2) whether text memory is hierarchical or heterarchical, (3) whether memory retrieval depends primarily on direct access or top-down search, and (4) whether lexical information is retained in memory. In experiments, subjects attempted to learn four texts and were tested--immediately or after one hour delay--for recall and recognition. Propositional recall, but not recognition, varied as a function of importance. On recognition tests, subjects distinguished statements taken directly from the texts from paraphrases of statements. The data suggest (1) subjects retain lexical information, (2) narrative schemata provide a framework for encoding all test propositions, (3) these schemata are hierarchically organized, and (4) the schemata are used for top-down retrieval.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.