Economic issues in local measured service

Bridger M. Mitchell

Expert InsightsPublished 1979

Discusses some economic issues that arise in the pricing of local telephone service. The present costs and rates for telephone service are reviewed, and economic analysis is applied to the issues of consumer access to the telephone network, the use of optional rates for local service, and the assessment of costs and benefits of measured rates. The author suggests that the concept of local measured-service telephone rates be given serious trials, and shows how basic economic principles should be employed in assessing subsidies for telephone access, optional flat rates, and the economic desirability of measured service.

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1979
  • Pages: 18
  • Document Number: P-6322

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Mitchell, Bridger M., Economic issues in local measured service. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1979. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6322.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.