Policymakers at all levels have argued for the expansion of Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) as a way to introduce some incentives for economy into the health care system. It is claimed that HMOs reduce costs by lowering the level of hospitalization--either admissions rates, length of stay, or surgery rates--and emphasizing preventive measures. The available evidence generally supports the former, but not the latter. The cost savings vary, however, with the organization of the HMO. Independent Practice Association (IPA) HMOs tend to show the smallest cost savings. But, the creation and expansion of IPAs is generally easier than for other types of HMOs; the type of HMO most likely to grow in number is thus the type likely to produce the least cost savings. Simple extrapolation of health cost savings from expected growth in HMO enrollment would seriously overestimate the likely cost savings.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.