Electricity Prices and the Poor

What Are the Effects and What Can We Do?

by Jan Paul Acton


Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback17 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Energy prices have risen faster than consumer prices in general and faster than incomes during the 1970s. Poorer households may have been particularly adversely affected if they have little price responsiveness. The paper explores the evidence of responsiveness to changes in electricity prices among low income households and households using below-average amounts of electricity. Such customers are found to have lower price elasticity of demand, so that price rises are taken mainly out of disposable income. The paper reviews the Los Angeles experience with a lifeline electricity rate for low income senior citizens. The program provided relief from rapidly rising prices without destroying the efficiency gains generally associated with market-clearing prices.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.