The polity of discussion: Bagehot's Physics and Politics revisited in the nuclear age
ResearchPublished 1980
Applies to our own age Walter Bagehot's mid-Victorian views on the quality of "animated moderation" and the concept he defined as "a polity of discussion." Bagehot's general theme is familiar: free and open discussion is good; secret action by unchallenged authority is bad--acceptable, even necessary, in war, but not in politics. That we have so far failed to develop a true polity of discussion is illustrated in two decisions faced by the U.S. government with respect to nuclear weapons. In 1945, the problem was the emerging reality of nuclear weapons and the need for international controls. More recently, a change in targeting policy emphasized selective retaliatory attacks. Neither decision resulted in a concrete conclusion. A polity of discussion was and is needed as a remedy against the alternative--polarization. The author contends that government by popular discussion creates better policies and support for them.
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 1980
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 12
- Paperback Price: $20.00
- Document Number: P-6544
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Bundy, McGeorge, The polity of discussion: Bagehot's Physics and Politics revisited in the nuclear age, RAND Corporation, P-6544, 1980. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6544.html
Bundy, McGeorge, The polity of discussion: Bagehot's Physics and Politics revisited in the nuclear age. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1980. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6544.html. Also available in print form.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.