An evaluation of economists' influence on electric utility rate reforms

Jan Paul Acton

ResearchPublished 1982

Considerable changes occurred in electricity rate levels and rate structures during the 1970s. This paper reviews economists' contributions in influencing the arguments put forth and the data provided. Economists contributed in estimating the probable effects of time-of-use rates on residential customers and in the choice and application of suitable evaluation criteria to alternative rate structures. The author concludes that, although economists participated in the design, implementation, and analysis of residential rate experiments, their contributions as a profession fell far short of what they should have been. Similarly, economists have made limited contributions to the quantitative analysis of benefits and costs of alternative rates. The author concludes that economists still have a possibly significant contribution to make in evaluating new rate forms for residential and large customers.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
14 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1982
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 14
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-6726

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Acton, Jan Paul, An evaluation of economists' influence on electric utility rate reforms, RAND Corporation, P-6726, 1982. As of October 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6726.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Acton, Jan Paul, An evaluation of economists' influence on electric utility rate reforms. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1982. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6726.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.