Outliers matter in survival analysis

Gaineford J. Hall, William H. Rogers, Daryl Pregibon

Expert InsightsPublished 1982

Regression diagnostic methods are extended to the exponential and Weibull distributions, yielding diagnostics comparable to Cook's distance and Belsley, Kuh, and Welsch's DFBETAS. These diagnostics are simple, cheap to compute, and effectively identify outlying cases in the response and factor variables. When applied to five well-analyzed datasets, these diagnostics show that outliers exist in survival analyses and can matter just as they do in ordinary regression. The same cases have almost identical effects on the parameters if the Cox model is used instead.

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1982
  • Pages: 40
  • Document Number: P-6761

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Hall, Gaineford J., William H. Rogers, and Daryl Pregibon, Outliers matter in survival analysis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1982. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6761.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.