The Air Force is exploring the development of a Tactical Force Management Training and Analysis Facility (TFMTAF). The center would probably use computer support to provide a realistic and challenging simulated combat environment. It is questionable whether such an environment can be created by pitting the players against a fully automated computer model of combat. This paper emphasizes the training function of the TFMTAF. Section II outlines the concept of training underlying the ideas presented in the paper. Section III examines some of those aspects and concludes that computerized combat models provide poor representations of them. Section IV outlines some of the major characteristics a hybrid simulator might have and suggests directions in which its development might proceed. The last section examines these functions in the light of the earlier analysis and argues that they would also be better served by a hybrid simulator than by one dependent on simulation based on conventional combat models.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.