Looking Back on the Housing Assistance Supply Experiment

Ira S. Lowry

ResearchPublished 1982

An overview of the Housing Assistance Supply Experiment conducted by RAND to provide housing assistance to low-income families. Of the "social experiments" undertaken by the federal government in the 1960s and 1970s, this was the largest in number of participants, longest in duration, most expensive, and operationally most complex. The author directed the research aspects of the program since its inception in 1971; the final report on the experiment will be published in 1982. In this paper he describes the experimental design and findings of the program, as well as methodological issues such as market effects and other research topics. He also discusses incidental benefits of the experiment and some disappointments. This paper is to appear in a volume of essays on various aspects of the Experimental Housing Allowance Program, edited by J. Friedman and D. H. Weinberg, and published by Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
30 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1982
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 30
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-6785

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Lowry, Ira S., Looking Back on the Housing Assistance Supply Experiment, RAND Corporation, P-6785, 1982. As of September 20, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6785.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Lowry, Ira S., Looking Back on the Housing Assistance Supply Experiment. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1982. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6785.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.